|
|
Self-Settled Trusts are commonly known as
Asset Protection Trusts, or APTs, for short. These are spendthrift
trusts that the settlor forms for his or her own benefit,
i.e., the settlor is a beneficiary as well as the settlor.
The idea is that the Settlor can convey assets to the trust,
and that after the conveyance the assets will be protected
from creditors and spouses of the Settlor.
For public policy reasons (primarily the
quite reasonable concept that people should be responsible
for their debts), most U.S. states have chosen not to recognize
self-settled spendthrift trusts. A common example is Oklahoma
§60-175.25(H) which provides that:
Nothing in this act shall authorize
a person to create a spendthrift trust or other inalienable
interest for his own benefit. The interest of the trustor
as a beneficiary of any trust shall be freely alienable
and subject to the claims of his creditors.
The offshore tax and debtor havens have
long offered trust statutes that allow self-settled spendthrift
trusts. These statutes, and the handful of cases considering
such trusts formed by U.S. settlors pursuant to these statutes,
are considered in our Foreign
Asset Protection Trusts section. Because the track record
of FAPTs when tested in court have been nothing short of
disastrous, these structures should be avoided by U.S. settlors
in all except the most rare of circumstances. Section includes
Analysis of Foreign Asset Protection Trusts, Foreign Trusts
Statutes, and Cases Involving Foriegn Asset Protection Trusts.
To attract financial business and compete
with offshore trusts, a few U.S. states have amended their
trust statutes to now allow self-settled spendthrift trusts.
These are considered in our Domestic
Asset Protection Trusts section. As will be shown, these
DAPTs have significant potential defects such that they
should be avoided until their benefits are actually established
in court, and not just in the marketing materials of those
hyping these structures. Section includes Analysis of Domestic
Asset Protection Trusts, Domestic APT Statutes, and Cases
Involving Domestic Asset Protection Trusts.
-
Self-Settled Spendthrift Trust
A trust formed for the benefit of the person who
created the trust, with spendthrift provisions that attempt
to disallow a creditor from invading the trust assets or
forcing a distribution to the beneficiary that the creditor
would then seize.
-
Domestic/Offshore Trust – See “Killer
Rabbit Trust”
-
Fleeing Trust – See “Killer
Rabbit Trust”
-
Flight Trust – See “Killer
Rabbit Trust”
-
Killer Rabbit Trust
An asset protection trust created initially as a domestic
trust, with the idea that if a serious problem arises
the trust will migrate to an offshore jurisdiction
where its assets will be protected from creditors. Planners who
form these trusts theorize (perhaps “wish” is a better term) that U.S. judges
will treat these trusts better than foreign asset protection trusts that
were formed offshore in the first place. The somewhat derisive but apt nickname
for this type of trust derives from the scene in Monty Python’s The
Holy Grail where King Arthur’s men confront a harmless bunny rabbit,
and then flee shouting “Run Away! Run Away!” when the bunny turns
vicious. Also sometimes referred to as a “Flight Trust” or “Fleeing
Trust” or “Domestic/Offshore Trust (DOT)”.
The efficacy of foreign asset protection trusts and their
planning limitations
|
|