|
For our famous summary chart showing
exemptions on a state-by-state basis for IRAs and ERISA
plans, homestead, life insurance and annuities,
Click Here |
|
|
| |
| |
 |
Financing Accounts Receivable for Retirement and Asset
Protection, by Ronald J. Adkisson |
| |
| |
|
Advanced Strategies |
|
Beneficiary-Taxed Irrevocable Trust |
|
Billing & Collection Company |
|
Closely-Held Insurance Company |
|
Xtreme LLC |
|
Modular Asset Protection |
|
Non-Qualified Personal Residence Trust |
|
RetireZ
Non-Qualified Private Retirement
Plan |
|
Series LLC |
|
Synthetic Roth |
| |
| |
|
Hazardous or
Overused Strategies |
|
Foreign Asset Protection Trust (FAPT) |
|
Domestic Asset Protection
Trust (DAPT) |
|
Land Trusts |
|
Family Limited Partnership (FLP) |
|
Nevada Corporations and LLCs |
|
|
|
|
|

The CAJP was formed by a group of dedicated, experienced
judgment recovery specialists, living and operating
businesses in the State of California. The purpose was
to organize and to share ideas, experience and resources
in order to more effectively enforce court judgments.
Since its founding in 1999 the
CAJP has grown to include over 130 judgment recovery
specialists throughout California. As with many
professional associations, new members often have varied
experience and knowledge. All new CAJP members are
required to take a certification test, prove their
business identity and business status, and to pay their
CAJP dues. CAJP members adhere to strict professional
guidelines when collecting judgments.
http://www.cajp.org
|
|
 |
California
Alter Ego & Veil Piercing |
|
|
The information given on this page is for educational and informational
purposes only, and does not constitute any legal or tax advice
or opinion. This page is meant to give a quick start to research
by other professionals, but it should absolutely not be relied
upon for any purposes whatsoever. Additionally, this page is kept
current only as our time allows, and the information given here
may not be current. We make NO GUARANTEES as to the accuracy of
the information herein and you should not rely on it. Even professionals
who use this information must independently verify whether it
is correct and current.
| For Asset Protection
Services in California |
|
Other California Law Sections
California
Alter Ego & Corporate
Veil Cases
-
Krausz
Puente LLC v. Frank Westall, et al.,
No. B164989 (Cal.App. 01/25/2005)
-
JLRB
Associates, et al. v. Mark T. Livingston,
No. D042738, D043800 (Cal.App. 01/20/2005)
-
Craig
V. Randall v. Gordon A. Campbell et al.,
No. H025938 (Cal.App. 01/11/2005)
-
Jan
Levinski v. Ronald E. Schmer et al.,
No. E033093 (Cal.App. 12/22/2004)
-
Sylvia
Chen v. Hall Construction, et al.,
No. G033139 (Cal.App. 12/20/2004)
-
Mindware
S.A. v. Canara Technologies Inc., et al.,
No. G031089 (Cal.App. 12/15/2004)
-
Emma
Mary Ellen Holley, et al. v. Grove S. Crank, Sr., et al.,
No. 99-5611 (9th Cir. 10/26/2004)
-
Cal
Pac Associates, Inc. v. Coussoulis Development Company,
2004.CA.0008132 (Cal.App. Dist.4 09/15/2004)
-
Shekhter
v. Seneca Structural Design, Inc.,
2004.CA.0007428 (Cal.App. Dist.2 08/24/2004)
-
Seaton
v. Runez,
2004.CA.0007376 (Cal.App. Dist.1 08/20/2004)
-
Raphael
v. Hill,
2004.CA.0005952 (Cal.App. Dist.4 06/30/2004)
-
Liqi
International Economic Development, Inc., U.S.A. v. Yee,
2004.CA.0004754 (Cal.App. Dist.2 05/27/2004)
-
City
Service Contracting v. Olen Commercial Realty Encumbrance
One
2004.CA.0004635 (Cal.App. Dist.4 05/25/2004)
-
Banknorth
v. Serap,
2004.CA.0003864 (Cal.App. Dist.2 04/29/2004)
-
Dunne
v. Barackman,
2004.CA.0003883 (Cal.App. Dist.4 04/29/2004)
-
Cigna
Corp. v. Superior Court of San Diego County,
No. D041359 (Cal.App. Dist.4 07/16/2003) (pdf)
-
Sellers
v. Home Americair of California,
No. G029299 (Cal.App. Dist.4 06/09/2003) (pdf)
-
Murdock
v. Ventures Trident II,
No. E030301 (Cal.App. Dist.4 05/30/2003) (pdf)
-
Hoffman
v. Harmony Pictures, Inc.
No. B152774 (Cal.App. Dist.2 12/04/2002) (pdf)
-
Spieker
Properties, L.P. v. Bunte,
No. G029277 (Cal.App. Dist.4 11/18/2002) (pdf)
-
Medical
Education Services, Inc. v. Sutherland Holdings, Ltd.,
No. E030128 (Cal.App. Dist.4 09/13/2002) (pdf)
-
Runez
v. Cedat Village, Inc.,
No. A095450 (Cal.App. Dist.1 09/09/2002) (pdf)
-
Carey
Premix, Inc. v. Ortega Rock Quarry, Inc.,
No. D038623 (Cal.App. Dist.4 08/08/2002) (pdf)
-
Electro
Lock, Inc. v. Core Industries, Inc.,
No. B134386 (Cal.App. Dist.2 05/28/2002) (pdf)
-
J.S.J.F.
Corp. v. Sizzler International, Inc.,
No. B152360 (Cal.App. Dist.2 05/13/2002) (pdf)
-
Bomil Inc.
v. Hoffelder,
No. D037094 (Cal.App. Dist.4 04/17/2002) (pdf)
-
Adaimy
v. Albertson and Evangelatos,
No. B148925 (Cal.App. Dist.2 03/26/2002) (pdf)
-
Folger
v. Cottle,
No. E028821 (Cal.App. Dist.4 03/15/2002) (pdf)
-
Jelco Construction,
Inc. v. Schoonenberg,
No. B145811 (Cal.App. Dist.2 02/06/2002) (pdf)
-
Peinado
v. Barnett,
No. A093923 (Cal.App. Dist.1 11/06/2001) (pdf)
-
McCellan
v. Northridge Park Townhome Owners Association, Inc.,
89 Cal.App.4th 746 (Cal.App. Dist.2 05/31/2001) (pdf)
-
Gruendl
v. Oewel Partnership, Inc.,
55 Cal.App.4th 654 (Cal.App. Dist.1 06/04/1997) (pdf)
-
Hambrecht
and Quist Venture Partners v. Amerian Medical International,
38 Cal.App.4th 1532 (Cal.App. Dist.2 10/05/1995) (pdf)
-
Lebastchi
v. Superior Court,
33 Cal.App.4th 1465 (Cal.App. Dist.4 04/07/1995) (pdf)
-
Brenelli
Amedeo v. Bankara Furniture, Inc.,
29 Cal.App.4th 1828 (Cal.App. Dist.2 11/14/1994) (pdf)
-
Carpenters
Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Acme Industries, Inc.,
224 Cal.App.3d 187 (Cal.App. Dist.1 09/28/1990) (pdf)
-
Shapoff
v. Scull,
222 Cal.App.3d 1457 (Cal.App. Dist.4 08/20/1990) (pdf)
-
Mesler
v. Bragg Management Co.,
219 Cal.App.3d 983 (Cal.App. Dist.2 04/23/1990) (pdf)
-
Stodd
v. Goldberger,
73 Cal. App. 3d 827 (Cal.App.Dist.4 09/30/1977)
-
Ortiz
v. South Bend Lathe,
46 Cal. App. 3d 842 (Cal.App.Dist.2 04/04/1975)
|
|