|
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
GENERALLY
What is asset protection?
Asset protection is planning that is
intended to lessen the rights of creditors and potential
creditors.
Is asset protection illegal?
Asset protection is not inherently
illegal.
There are some types of asset protection
that are perfectly legal, such as paying down your house in
a state that exempts a homestead from foreclosure and sale.
Asset protection can be illegal,
however. A transfer to defeat the rights of existing of
anticipated creditors that violates the fraudulent transfer
laws is illegal. Hiding money in an offshore account and not
disclosing the account on a bankruptcy schedule is illegal.
Defeating the collection rights of the IRS is illegal. These
are just a few examples.
Techniques for protecting assets outside
of recognized statutory exemptions must be carefully
evaluated as to whether they cross the line and are illegal.
Who invented asset protection?
Nobody "invented" asset protection.
Debtors have been protecting assets for longer than anybody
can remember. Once of the first American cases involving
asset protection, the Dr. Luke Barber case, was heard in the
colonial courts in 1664.
So what about all these guys who claim that they
are the "Father of Asset Protection"?
They are all full of it. One of the
problems with asset protection is that there are a bunch of
idiots running around making all sorts of outrageous and
demonstrably false claims.
The one person who probably is worthy of
the title of the "Modern Father of Asset Protection" is
Colorado attorney Barry Engel, who effectively kicked off
the recent interest in asset protection by drafting a
revised Cook Islands trust statute in the late 1980s. While
recent case law has raised substantial questions about the
effectiveness of offshore trusts, the effect of Barry on
asset protection as a business cannot be understated.
But Barry himself does not claim the
title of "Father of Asset Protection". The several that do
make this outrageously false claim are idiots, and all have
one or more sordid facts in their backgrounds that you
probably wouldn't want your reputation associated with
theirs. If somebody claims that they are the "Father of
Asset Protection", run.
Isn't asset protection about all that offshore
stuff?
In the 1990s, the term "asset
protection" was synonymous with offshore planning, meaning
planning in one of the Caribbean or similar jurisdictions
that had written their law to thwart creditors. By far most
asset protection was then done offshore.
After the Anderson case illustrated the
defects of offshore trusts in 1998, after heightened
reporting requirements for offshore transactions following
the events of 9/11 and the Patriot Act, and with greatly
increased IRS penalties for even harmless misreporting of
offshore entities and activities, most asset protection has
moved back on-shore and is conducted wholly domestically.
We do not, for instance, utilize
offshore planning unless our client has a specific,
compelling need for such planning, such as that the client
has family or substantial business interests outside the
United States.
|