|
ERISA and Welfare Benefit Plans
29 U.S.C. § 1056(d)(1), commonly known as the "ERISA
Anti-Alienation Provision" states that "[e]ach pension plan shall
provide that benefits provided under the plan may not be assigned or alienated." This
means that the assets in an ERISA pension plan are not available to creditors.
Thus, pension planning provides a method for business owners to remove moneys
from their businesses to an ERISA pension plan -- and to generate a sizeable
tax deduction in the process -- and thereafter have those assets protected
from most creditors (caution that in some circumstances spouses and the IRS
may be able to get at the assets).
The three most common types of plans are:
-
412(i)
Defined Benefit Plans
Asset protection planning via tax-deductible contributions into a defined
benefit plan that is protected from creditors under ERISA. Essentially,
an asset protection plan that is subsidized by tax breaks given by Congress,
and an easy and efficient solution for small businesses and their owners.
-
419A(f)(6)
Employee Benefit Plans and
Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Associations (VEBAs)
Asset protection planning via tax-deductible contributions into an employee
benefit plan that is protected from creditors under ERISA.
- 419(e) Welfare
Benefit Plans
Funds that provide certain benefits for the welfare of employees that can be
creditor protected by the ERISA anti-alienation benefits if organized as a
trust.
Used together, these plans give business owners the opportunity
to shift upwards of $500,000 per year out of their business in a tax deductible
fashion, and thereafter protect those assets from creditors as a "nest
egg" for retirement or to pass on to heirs. The plans represent fundamental
planning techniques that are commonly overlooked by asset protection promoters
who are looking to selling exotic big-dollar structures, which do not have
the efficient and tested benefits of these plans.
Additional Resources
Statutory Law
U.S. Supreme Court Cases
-
Raymond
B. Yates, M.D. v. Hendon, No. 02-458 (03/02/2004)
-
Patterson
v. Shumate, 112 S. Ct. 2242, 119 L. Ed. 2d
519 (1992)
-
Guidry
v. Sheet Metal Workers Nat’l Pension Fund,
493 U.S. 365, 110 S. Ct. 680, 107 L. Ed. 2d 782 (1990)
-
Mackey
v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service,
486 U.S. 825, 108 S. Ct. 2182, 100 L. Ed. 2d 836 (1988)
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Cases
-
IRS
v. Snyder, ___
F.3d ___ (9th Cir. Appeal No. 02-15618, September 15, 2003)
-
U.S. v. Taylor,
___ F.3d ___ ( 8th Cir. No. 01-2874, July 31, 2003)
-
In re Nelson, 8th
Cir. BAP Appeal No. 01-6072MN, March 21, 2002
-
In re Weinhoeft, 275
F.3d 604 (7th Cir. 2001)
-
In re Kim, Appeal
No. CC-00-1123 (9th Cir. BAP 2000)
-
Taunt
v. General Retirement System, 233
F.3d 899, 2000 Fed.App. 0389, 36 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 293 (6th Cir. 2000)
State Cases
New Jersey
North Dakota
|
|

The all-time asset protection
best seller is available from:
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble.com

Adkisson's Captive Insurance Companies:
An Introduction to Captives, Closely-Held Insurance
Companies and Risk Retention Groups
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
|