Asset Protection Sitemap | Contact Us   
   Topical Research | | Lexicon | BLOG | Discussion  
   Navigation
 
Asset Protection Specific Industry Concerns Professional Practice Concerns Exemption Planning Business Entities Captive Insurance Trusts & Foundations Transactions & Transfers International & Offshore State Resources Articles & Publications Asset Protection Chapters Other Website Features

Call Toll-Free
1-888-359-8851

   Recommended Reading

Financing Accounts Receivables for Retirement and Asset Protection
by Ronald J. Adkisson

Accounts Receivables Financing

   See Also

Riser Adkisson
http://www.risad.com

 


 

Tennessee

Warning: The following opinion is provided for purposes of discussion only. We have not Shepardized™ this opinion, and do not know the subsequent disposition of this case nor whether the effect of the opinion has been overruled or superceded by other law.

Edwin H. Bush and William F. Gibson v. Tony Wesley Carrick
1997.TN.19485 (Tenn.App. 04/30/1997)

COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE, MIDDLE SECTION, AT NASHVILLE

C/A No. 01A01-9609-CH-00408

1997.TN.19485

April 30, 1997

EDWIN H. BUSH AND WILLIAM F. GIBSON, CO-ADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF LONNIE MAE LANE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS

v.

TONY WESLEY CARRICK, INDIVIDUALLY AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HARVEY WESLEY CARRICK, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

APPEALED FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF BEDFORD COUNTY AT SHELBYVILLE, TENNESSEE. THE HONORABLE TYRUS H. COBB, CHANCELLOR. BEDFORD CHANCERY NO. 19,559.

Allen Shoffner, Shelbyville, Tn, Attorney for Appellants.

Tamra L. Smith, Norton & Smith, Shelbyville, Tn, Attorney for Appellee.

Houston M. Goddard, Presiding Judge, Concur: Herschel P. Franks, J., Don T. McMurray, J.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Goddard

The complaint in this case contends that the transfer of funds represented by a $37,500 certificate of deposit by Mr. Carrick to himself, rendered the father's estate insolvent and therefore was fraudulent as to creditors.

The suit seeks to set aside the transfer to aid the Co-Administrators of the estate of Lonnie Mae Lane in collecting Ms. Lane's claim against the estate of Mr. Carrick's father in the amount of $19,500, which had been previously sustained by the Probate Court in a contested hearing.

Although the certificate of deposit was in the joint names of Mr. Carrick and his father, the funds were entirely those of his father.

The Trial Court sustained Mr. Carrick's motion for summary judgment, finding the suit was barred by the ten-year statute of limitations set out in T.C.A. 28-3-110(3) and also by the doctrine of res judicata.

The Co-Administrators appeal, insisting the Trial Court was in error in both instances.

As to the statute of limitations, we first note that both parties agree the ten-year statute is applicable to this suit.

It appears from the depositions and affidavits in the record that when the certificate of deposit matured on September 6, 1984, Mr. Carrick endorsed the certificate, received the proceeds, and used them in the construction of his home. Because the present suit was not filed until October 3, 1994, the Trial Court found ten years had expired, thus barring the claim. The critical question in resolving this feature of the appeal is when Ms. Lane, or the Co-Executors, knew or should have known of the transfer and the further fact that the transfer had rendered the father's estate insolvent. Hoffman v. Hospital Affiliates, Inc., 652 S.W.2d 341 (Tenn.1983); McCroskey v. Bryant Air Conditioning Company, 524 S.W.2d 487 (Tenn.1975); Gosnell v. Ashland Chemical, Inc., 674 S.W.2d 737 (Tenn.App.1984).

Our inquiry, then, is whether the record discloses without dispute that Ms. Lane or the Co-Executors knew or should have known of their cause of action prior to October 3, 1984, ten years prior to the date the present suit was filed.

The complaint alleges that Ms. Lane did not know of the transfer, much less that it rendered the father's estate insolvent, and there is nothing in the record to the contrary. Indeed, a document filed by Mr. Carrick in the Probate Court would lead one to believe the estate was solvent. We say this because the Petition of Probate, filed April 2, 1987, listed "real property owned by the decedent - $220,000." Moreover, the Notice of Insolvency pursuant to T.C.A. 30-5-102 was not filed in the Probate Court until June 18, 1991.

Clearly, the undisputed proof does not show that Ms. Lane or the Co-Executors knew or should have known of the transfer rendering the father's estate insolvent before October 3, 1984, (a date ten years prior to the filing of the present suit), which was less than 30 days after the fact.

As to the issue of res judicata, the record discloses that there was a prior suit between the same parties seeking to set aside three separate real estate conveyances and alleging that they were fraudulent because these transfers rendered the estate insolvent. In that suit, the Trial Court found in favor of Mr. Carrick on the ground that at the time of the transfer of realty, the father still owned the certificate of deposit which is central to this suit.

The prior suit involved three transfers of realty and not the certificate of deposit. It appears that in the prior suit the Co-Administrators were allowed to re-open their proof and explore the circumstances surrounding the transfer of the certificate of deposit as it impacted their suit seeking to set aside the conveyances of real estate, which prompted them to seek an amendment to their complaint also alleging its fraudulent transfer. The Trial Court, however, denied their motion to amend, finding that the Co-Administrators were attempting to "add a new cause of action."

It thus appears that the issue in question in this case was neither tried nor, in light of the Trial Court's ruling, could have been tried in the prior action.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Trial Court is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Costs of appeal are adJudged against Mr. Carrick.

Houston M. Goddard, P.J.

CONCUR:

Herschel P. Franks, J.

Don T. McMurray, J.

The legal opinions are a matter of public record (that's how we got them), and as such there can be no defamation for republishing them. Sometimes, however, legal opinions are reversed, vacated, or significantly modified, etc., and we do not discover this fact until somebody points it out to us. As we do not desire to publish inaccurate or outdated information, if a legal opinion has been reversed, vacated, or significantly modified, please advise us of this fact immediately, by fax to (877) 698-0678 or you may also send regular postal correspondence to Riser Adkisson LLP at 1827 Powers Ferry Road, Building One, Suite 200, Atlanta GA 30339.

 

 

spacer
Nothing in this website is any substitute for the legal advice or opinion of a licensed attorney in your state. This website is simply a starting resource for information on the topics herein and does not claim to provide any definitive answer and should not be relied upon for any purposes whatsoever. Non-professionals should seek the assistance of a licensed attorney in their jurisdictions, and professionals should please consult the primary source materials such as statutes and case laws directly. Nothing in this website may be relied upon under IRS Circular 230 to avoid penalties for an incorrect tax position.

Adkisson Publishing Inc. is not a law firm and does not provide any legal service of any nature whatsoever. Adkisson Publishing Inc. is a publisher of books, websites and provides speakers on various topics. The person responsible for this website is Jay D. Adkisson in his capacity of President of Adkisson Publishing Inc. and questions regarding it should be addressed to him at Adkisson Publishing, Inc., P.O. Box 7088, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677.

spacer© 2007 by Adkisson Publishing Inc.. All rights reserved. No portion of this page or any portion of this website may be reprinted or otherwise duplicated without express written permission of Adkisson Publishing Inc.. Legal issues should be faxed to (877) 698-0678.
Additional Important Information

Captive Insurance -- Equity-Indexed Annuities -- Accounts Receivable Financing
Financial Scams and Tax Frauds Revealed -- LostEye -- Contact

Proud Supporter of Quatloos.com